When Serge Lachapelle of Google spoke at WebRTC last week, the discussion was very straightforward about where Google was driving WebRTC. They were improving the codecs to the point where the metrics would make the OTT solution without any hardware support better than the optimized voice over LTE [VoLTE] supported in the hardware.
The implications were that developers should stay with Google and develop their solutions as if it was the Web and not the phone that mattered. Phones that did not support WebRTC or were going to have their own versions would be isolated and marginalized.
In other words, Google was not going to slow down its WebRTC work to accommodate ORTC, or find a way to make Apple part of the mix. Their focus was improvement, not accommodation.
It’s pretty straightforward, but there was another front being attacked besides the West Coast computing companies. It was to the carriers themselves: VoTT versus VoLTE has huge implications for carrier pricing.
For years the carriers have been coping with pricing model anomalies that consumers demanded but carriers could not deliver...Read More
By 
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar